NEW DELHI: Observing that the concept of maternity leave is not just a matter of fair play and social justice but also a constitutional guarantee to women employees, Supreme Court Friday set aside a Madras HC order denying the leave to a govt teacher for birth of her third child.
A bench of Justices Abhay S Oka and Ujjal Bhuyan said maternity leave is intended to achieve the objective of delivering social justice to women workers, to enable a woman to not only subsist but also make up her dissipated energy, nurse her child, preserve her efficiency as a worker and maintain the level of her previous efficiency.
The bench said, "Women now constitute a sizeable portion of the workforce, & must be treated with honour and dignity... The HC went on to explain the impact of pregnancy on the physiological and psychological state of a woman employee undergoing pregnancy. It is not just motherhood but also childhood that requires special attention."
The HC had denied the benefit, citing a state govt policy not to grant the leave in case of birth of more than two children as a measure to control population.
Quashing the HC's order, SC noted that the woman's third child was born out of her second marriage. "The right of every woman to make reproductive choices without undue interference from the State is central to the idea of human dignity and deprivation of access to reproductive healthcare or emotional and physical wellbeing also injures the dignity of women," it said.
A bench of Justices Abhay S Oka and Ujjal Bhuyan said maternity leave is intended to achieve the objective of delivering social justice to women workers, to enable a woman to not only subsist but also make up her dissipated energy, nurse her child, preserve her efficiency as a worker and maintain the level of her previous efficiency.
The bench said, "Women now constitute a sizeable portion of the workforce, & must be treated with honour and dignity... The HC went on to explain the impact of pregnancy on the physiological and psychological state of a woman employee undergoing pregnancy. It is not just motherhood but also childhood that requires special attention."
The HC had denied the benefit, citing a state govt policy not to grant the leave in case of birth of more than two children as a measure to control population.
Quashing the HC's order, SC noted that the woman's third child was born out of her second marriage. "The right of every woman to make reproductive choices without undue interference from the State is central to the idea of human dignity and deprivation of access to reproductive healthcare or emotional and physical wellbeing also injures the dignity of women," it said.
You may also like
Ange Postecoglou drops huge Tottenham future tease with next season promise
CBS ordered to pay nearly $10 million to fired executive who called anchor 'too gay', blames 'woke mob' pressure
Man Utd captain Bruno Fernandes 'set Saudi transfer deadline' after £200m offer
Fresh H-1B row as Walmart slashes 1500 tech jobs, Indian-origin Suresh Kumar blamed
Son Heung-min leads celebrations and drops F-bomb as Spurs stage Europa League victory parade