RAIPUR: A husband cannot demand access to his spouse’s personal information or communication as that would amount to infringement of privacy, Chhattisgarh high court has ruled, dismissing a man’s plea seeking the call detail records (CDR) of his wife.
Asserting that privacy is a constitutionally protected right under Article 21 that marriage cannot override, the court said forcing the wife to share her phone call or bank account details could even attract domestic violence charges.
“Marriage does not grant the husband automatic access to the wife’s private information, communications and personal belongings. The husband cannot compel his wife to share her passwords for the cellphone or bank account, and such an act would amount to a violation of privacy and potentially domestic violence. There should be a balance between marital privacy and the need for transparency and, at the same time, trust in the relationship,” Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey said, upholding a Durg family court’s order.
The first additional principal judge of family court had in June last year rejected his application for his wife’s CDR.
He argued his wife frequently spoke to her brother-in-law for long periods, suggesting a possible illicit relationship.
Asserting that privacy is a constitutionally protected right under Article 21 that marriage cannot override, the court said forcing the wife to share her phone call or bank account details could even attract domestic violence charges.
“Marriage does not grant the husband automatic access to the wife’s private information, communications and personal belongings. The husband cannot compel his wife to share her passwords for the cellphone or bank account, and such an act would amount to a violation of privacy and potentially domestic violence. There should be a balance between marital privacy and the need for transparency and, at the same time, trust in the relationship,” Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey said, upholding a Durg family court’s order.
The first additional principal judge of family court had in June last year rejected his application for his wife’s CDR.
He argued his wife frequently spoke to her brother-in-law for long periods, suggesting a possible illicit relationship.
You may also like
Maharashtra Mulls Law To Mandate Rent Payments For Tenants In Stalled Redevelopment Projects
Bombay HC Rejects Indian Couple's Plea To Adopt US-Born Nephew, Says Juvenile Justice Act Doesn't Apply
Bihar Politics: Lalan Singh's Mutton Feast During Saawan Sparks Political Row
Calcutta HC acquits three on death row for 2014 murder
Mumbai News: Woman Booked For Stealing Tablets And Laptop From Empower Library In Govandi, FIR Registered
